引用本文:韩立东.卷钢座架强度的理论计算与试验结果的对比[J].包装工程,2020,41(7):147-151.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2012次   下载 1354 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
卷钢座架强度的理论计算与试验结果的对比
韩立东
西南交通大学,成都 611756
摘要:
目的 研究铁路货物装载加固座架的强度估算方法。方法 进行了卷钢座架的静态和冲击动强度试验,测量了静态和冲击过程中座架危险截面的应力。同时,依据《铁路货物装载加固规则》的有关规定,计算了卷钢座架所受的作用力,利用有限元方法计算了在此力作用下座架的强度,对比了卷钢座架静态和冲击试验测量的应力和理论计算的应力。结果 试验值与理论计算值的误差约为10%,理论计算的应力值具有较高的精度。结论 在缺乏试验条件的场合下,可以用理论的方法来估算座架的强度。
关键词:  铁路运输  装载加固  冲击试验  纵向惯性力
DOI:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.07.020
分类号:TB485.1
基金项目:
Comparative Study on Theoretical Calculation and Test Results of the Strength of a Reinforced Frame
HAN Li-dong
Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Abstract:
The paper aims to study the method for evaluating the strength of a railway cargo loading and reinforcement device (CLRD). Static and impact strength tests were carried out on a reinforced frame to measure the stress on the dangerous section of a reinforced frame during static and dynamic impact. The maximum force acting on the device was calculated according to the relevant provisions of the "Rules for Railway Cargo Loading and Reinforcement"; and the strength of the device under the force was evaluated with the finite element method. At the same time, the stress obtained by static and shock dynamic tests and the stress by theoretical calculation were compared. The error between the tested value and the theoretical calculation result was about 10%. The value obtained from theoretical calculation had high precision. In the absence of test conditions, the simulation can be used to evaluate the strength of the CLRD.
Key words:  railway transportation  loading reinforcement  impact test  longitudinal inertia force

关于我们 | 联系我们 | 投诉建议 | 隐私保护

您是第24463920位访问者    渝ICP备15012534号-2

版权所有:《包装工程》编辑部 2014 All Rights Reserved

邮编:400039 电话:023—68792836传真:023—68792396 Email: designartj@126.com

    

  
 

渝公网安备 50010702501717号