| 摘要: |
| 对中散包装与危险品包装生命周期进行了评价研究。利用Simapro 软件对2 种固体危险货物包装形式———一般包装(瓦楞纸箱)和中型散装容器(纤维板箱IBC)进行了生命周期分析,并将结果进行了对比。可以看出中型散装容器与一般包装相比优势明显,在分析所涉及的11 个环境类别的影响上均小于一般包装,其中,差距最大的为臭氧层耗竭损害,仅为一般包装的60%,最小的为酸化/ 富营养化,为一般包装的90%。结果显示IBC 优势明显,在大量货物运输的过程中,若2 种包装类型均能达到运输效果,应选取对环境影响较小的IBC 进行运输。 |
| 关键词: 危险货物包装 生命周期评价 环境影响 Simapro |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TB484 |
| 基金项目:2012 年国家质检总局科技计划项目(2012IK212) |
|
| Comparison Study of Life Cycle Assessment for Dangerous Goods Packaging and Intermediate Bulk Container |
|
FENG Zhi-jie1,2, HOU Qian3, MAO Guo-zhu3, ZHAO Lin3
|
|
1. Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;2. Tianjin Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Tianjin 300201, China;3.Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The life cycle of dangerous goods packaging and intermediate bulk container was studied and assessed. Simapro software was used to conduct life cycle analysis of two types of solid dangerous goods packaging-usual packaging (corrugated boxes) and Intermediate Bulk Container (fiberboard boxes IBC) and the results were compared with each other. IBC has obvious advantages over the usual packaging in the comparative analysis of lifecycle, including 11 categories of impact on the environment. Among them, the biggest gap is ozone depletion damage, only 60% of the usual packaging, while the smallest is the acidification/ eutrophication, 90% of the usual packaging. IBC has distinct advantages in the transport of large amounts of goods. Under the condition that both IBC and corrugated boxes meet the transportation requirements. IBC should be chosen preferentially for packing transported goods due to its less impact on the environment. |
| Key words: dangerous goods packaging life cycle assessment environmental impact Simapro |
